Home Services Plans Technology Journal For Teams For Business Partnerships Stories Careers About Pinch Patron Portal Life Complexity Quiz Book a Call
Home & Relationships
Chapter 46

What to Avoid

~2 min read The Art of Domestic Harmony

Just as important as what to do is what not to do when giving feedback. Here are some common pitfalls that derail feedback and create friction:

Giving feedback only when angry: If the only time a staff member gets "feedback" is when you've been pushed to a boiling point, it will always come out as an outburst, not a constructive dialogue. This trains staff to dread any time you want to talk, because it's associated with high emotion and possibly disproportionate reaction. It's far better to address things when you're calm. If you find yourself about to explode, it's actually better to delay feedback ("I'm upset right now; let's discuss this after I've cooled down") than to unleash. An outburst might relieve your frustration momentarily, but it rarely results in improved behaviour and often causes new problems (fear, resentment, breakdown in communication).

Public scolding or sarcasm: We touched on this, but to emphasise: criticising someone in front of others (family, colleagues, guests) is humiliating and rarely yields a positive change. It often causes the person to mentally check out ("I was shamed, nothing to lose now" or just deep embarrassment that turns into anger). Sarcasm, like "Oh great, you did another brilliant job with the laundry (eye-roll)," is equally corrosive. It's indirect mockery that doesn't even clearly instruct on what was wrong. It just makes the person feel small and confused. Plus, other staff witnessing this will fear that they could be next, harming overall morale.

Triangulating ("everyone feels this way"): Saying things like "everyone has been complaining about how you do X" is very tempting to justify your point, but it's a form of gossip and indirect attack. It makes the person feel ganged up on and breeds mistrust among the team ("Who's been talking about me?"). If something needs feedback, take ownership of it as the leader: it's between you and them. You can mention others if relevant in a factual way ("Two family members noticed dishes were greasy, so I wanted to raise the dishwashing method with you"), but don't frame it as anonymous colleagues trashing them behind their back.

Dragging up old mistakes: Focus on the issue at hand. If, while giving feedback on today's issue, you bring up "and last month you also did Y, and remember in 2019 that Z incident?", you overload the conversation. It distracts from the current solvable problem and suggests you have a laundry list of grudges. That's demotivating because the person feels, "No matter what I do now, they're still holding my past over me." If past incidents form a pattern, you can discuss patterns, but frame it as a pattern ("I notice a pattern we should address") rather than listing offences. Often, it's best to stick to the current event or the most recent instance as representative.

In summary, avoid turning feedback into an attack or drama. The minute it becomes a personal venting session or a shame fest, its effectiveness drops to zero (except perhaps to scare someone into compliance, which isn't sustainable or healthy). Think of yourself as a coach, not a fault-finder. A coach's job is to improve the team's performance, and that means giving pointers and practice, not yelling from the sidelines (at least not in a home context).